Seller thus grants buyer a call option (the call option), the seller`s [total] shares in the company under this Agreement. The main reasons why individuals may use put and call options are as follows: Before entering into an appeal option agreement, the parties should consider other corporate documents to determine whether additional permissions are required. A put option therefore offers a safety net for a potential seller by guaranteeing a price of his shares for a limited period of time. There is nothing in the publicly available parts of the hmrc manuals to indicate that hmRC considers the existence of put and call options that can be exercised during the same period to be a BPR block. However, if the parties are not disadvantaged in the spread of options, adopting this approach may reduce the likelihood that an HMRC official will refer the matter to the Technical Division. This is a type of option that allows a potential seller (but not a bond) to sell an asset (i.e. shares) to a buyer at a pre-agreed price (sometimes referred to as an „exercise price“) or at a price to be defined according to a formula agreed in advance or on a determined date in the future. This Call Option Agreement model is concluded between a grantor and a grantee. The Fellow is granted the right (but not the obligation) to exercise, within a specified period of time and at a specified price, an option to purchase (or call) the grantor`s shares (which are the subject of the option) in the company.

If the option is not exercised within the agreed period, it expires. The put and call option agreement should be established within the framework of the company`s articles of association and/or a shareholders` agreement, for example by ensuring that the terms of the put/call options are not contrary to the preferential rights set out in the articles of association. The proposal does not take into account the tax and tax implications of the option. The RMC website contains relevant information and should be taken into consideration. The exercise of an appeal option will not in itself entail stamp duty. Stamp duty must be paid on relocation forms equivalent to 0.5% of the value of the consideration for the transfer of shares. The transfer form as a document that actually transfers the shares is the excise document. Note that the fellow cannot be registered as the rightful owner of the shares until stamped share transfer forms are submitted to the company. HMRC agrees that, where partners or shareholders grant options to purchase each other`s shares in the business in the event of death or retirement, this does not constitute a binding sales contract until the PRs of the deceased partner or shareholder are required to sell to the surviving owners of the business and those owners are not required to buy. Therefore, a cross option agreement does not usually result in the rejection of the BPR (note: a cross option is an agreement in which two or more parties grant a put and appeal option to the other parties. They are often used by partners and shareholders of small businesses to retain control of all shares issued after the death of a partner or shareholder). The proposal assumes that both parties are individuals.

However, this can be changed if one or both parties are businesses. The proposal also assumes that the consideration for the purchase of the shares by the stock exchange will be in cash and that the option itself will be granted as a nominal consideration, for example. B £1. the exercise of the option is not subject to any conditions; they should be added if necessary. The option can normally be exercised by the seller for an agreed period. McCutcheon on Inheritance Tax (Sweet and Maxwell, No. 6. Edition, 2013) does not discuss the issue of simultaneous or successive options and only notes in paragraphs 26 to 73: The company may grant the call option for the issuance of new shares or a shareholder for the transfer of existing shares. .

. .